The Fake Jews – The Greatest Lie Ever Told – History is Not What You Think

LET THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES
TODAY I was sent a video of Dr. David Duke, where he had on a guest Dr Kevin MacDonald .. They are bent on subverting the facts and truth .. Refuse to look at art, archeology, writings from the so called Jews own Book – The Bible, along with the History of these so Called JEWS. They want you to believe that most of world Jewry is Sephardi .. well they are not According to their own numbers the Sephardi make up about 2 – 3% of Jewry .. It is the Ashkenazi that are the largest in numbers. .. Neither the Sephardi or Ashkenazi are the Hebrew Israelites .. The Sephardi come from Esau, Jacob – Israel’s brother. Esau lost his inheritance mainly because he married a Hittite woman and angered his Father Issac and his mother Rebecca.
Genesis 26:34&35 “When Esau was forty years old, he married Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and also Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. They were a source of grief to Isaac and Rebekah.”
 ( Hittites were White People) The Hittites were Aryans .. they came from the Iranian plateau, 
Linguistically “Iran” is an Aryan term found in no other language. According to the Bible .. Keeping the Bloodline pure was as important as the Current Jews want to make believe,  but the fact is .. the The Ashkenazi and Sephardi are MUTTS .. even Hitler called the Jews and Negros .. BASTARDS!! Could there have been some interbreeding there too, Black and White .. Black and JEW?
During the middle ages when the Khazar country was being attacked and defeated by a number of factions .. Alexander the Great .. the medieval Kievan Rus .. and finally by Genghis Khan .. This is where the Ashkenazi Jews come from. During this same time the Sephardi Jews were being expelled from Spain and Forced into Turkey.
Turkey already had a majority of Khazar-Jews residing there and they formed the “Donmeh” The Name Khan is a typical Ashkenazi Name .. as they were both Turkic Mongol in their bloodlines .. the Turkic Term “Donmeh” means a Transvestite.
(pretending to be something that they are not) and also not to be trusted!!
   Lets take a look at the Book that the Jews want you to believe that they wrote.. The Bible .. Starting in the first book Genesis it clearly points out that the Ashkenazi DO NOT come from the Linage of Abraham or Shem .. but we can go back even further and find out where they actually did come from.
We can begin in the time of Noah

Genesis 10:1-3 the books of Moses 

10 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. 

 

view large image

I suppose there are good reasons that the JEW don’t want you to look in the Bible .. Particularly the Books of Moses. aka the old testament .. the Torah .. the Koran,  Why? Because it is here where it clearly points out that the world JEWRY is not the true Abrahamic Linage .. but it also points clearly to the people who are.

Furthermore these JEWS don’t want you to look at any early writings, art, archeology and historical facts. Primarily because it will expose their fraud and therefore show their illegitimacy as occupiers to the Land known as Palestine.  They don’t want people to understand that the Bible points out that it is a dark people .. possibly Negro type people that are the Hebrew Israelites, despite the fact that the Bible shows that the Israelites would be sold back into slavery with a YOKE OF IRON around their necks. Are these the same people that were the Hebrew Israelites? I cannot say for sure but it is plain as day that the ones that call themselves GOD’S CHOSEN have never filled this description at any point in history.

Who were the Edomites? The Edomites according to my research show that they were from the linage of Esau. Esau according to their own book was banned from associating with any of the Israelites. No Race mixing Allowed.. Period End of Story ..

Sephardic jews (less than 2% of all jews) claim to be descendants of Edomites whose patriarch was Esau, who was banned from his people (other descendants of Abraham) for miscegenating with Canaanite women Hittites to be more precise.  His descendants never socialized with Israelites, who were the descendants of Jacob, Esau’s brother.  Descendants of an Israelite who miscegenated with an Edomite were neither Israelites or Edomites, so could you explain to us how Sephardic jews could possibly have been Israelites?

Ashkenaz jews (who are more than 90% of all jews according to their writings) claim that they are descendants of Ashkenaz, who was a descendant of Japheth.  This is disputed by jew Koestler who claims that they are descendants of Khazars who didn’t even convert to Judaism until the 9th Century AD, and thus were not even descendants of Japheth, much less Shem or Israelites.  In neither event could Ashkenazi jews have been descendants of Eber (whose descendants are Hebrews) because Eber was a descendant of Shem, Japheth’s brother.  And because Israelites never considered the offspring of an Israelite who married an Edomite, Moabite, Ashkenazi, Cushite, Canaanite, Khazar, or any other non-Israelites to be an Israelite, then how exactly it is possible that any jew could have been an Israelite?

If jews aren’t really descendants of Moabites, or Edomites, or Ashkenzis, or Canaanites, or Cushites, or Jehudis, or Khazars, or any other non-Israelite, as both the Holy Bible and numerous jewish writings claim they are, then it’s physically and legally impossible for jews to have ever been Israelites, either then or now.

The only thing you can do to try to recover from one more utterly ridiculous statement (like the one where you claimed that Israelite law didn’t apply to Ruth because she was a woman) is to claim you meant that you believe jews are descendants of the Israelites who are known to have miscegenated with the foreign women who, along with their children, were put away by the Israelites:

Ezra 10:3  Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all
the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my
lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be
done according to the law.

iow, you have no choice but to acknowledge that, at best, jews were never Israelites but that they are related to Israelites because they are the products of miscegenation of non-Israelites with Israelites, and are thus mongrels.

Or, conversely, you must claim that most jewish writings and the Holy Bible are LIES.

If jews are even remotely related to any of these races, which the Torah and Talmud CLAIM they are, then by definition, it’s impossible for jews to have ever been Israelites.

Where did the DNA similarities between Sephardi and Achkenazi come from?  .. IMO where the Ashkenazi and the Sephardi get their DNA similarities are from when the Sephardi where run out of Spain .. where did they go .. they were forced into Turkey .. where there were already a shit load of Ashkenazi – Khazarians for hundreds of years.

The hebrew Israelites come from the linage of Shem
true hebrew Israelites would be more closer to those of Ham than Japheth
because of their time in captivity in Egypt.
With this dogma of Duke’s it would somehow legitimize their being in the land of Palestine / Israel ..
I call Bull Shit on Him and his thesis and would promote this as legitimate GATE KEEPING
THE WHITEWASHING OF JESUS MESIAH
To My knowledge it was during the Renaissance period where this took place. But if we look at earlier art
we can see that for thousands of years the Christ figure was Portrayed as a dark complected individual.
It also may be noted that even the Popes still today continue to Pray to a Black Baby Jesus.
All ancient art portrays Him and the Mary figure in the same light.
As to Jesus this Christ Figure. He was not a Jew .. He was a Nazarene and spoke Aramaic.

 

 

 

One may get a little better understanding by watching my Documentary

“The Greatest Lie Ever told .. History is Not What You Think part 1 & 2

In Part 2: It ties together the 3 Main causes of conflict in the Middle East Today

Israel, Saudi Arabia and Turkey .. A connection by Blood

Weather or not you believe in the Bible or not here are some interesting facts you might think about and questions you should ask.

Why do we have people like Koestler send you down the path that the Jews from the Khazar Region are not the desendents of Japheth but refuse to admit that in the Torah and Bible it says precisely this?

Why is it that every country that these fake Jews invade or have their proxy’s like the US plunder historical sights particularly for ancient artifacts.

Why when Japan the Psychopathic Jew Truman Bombed Japan  after they sought to surrender and wanted to sign a peace treaty.

Two of warfare’s great crimes were inflicted when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians and in the bitterest of ironies wiping out Nagasaki’s Christian community which had survived long-term Japanese persecution.

This was the Largest Christian Community in all of Asia.

I say this all of the time .. “It does not matter what you and I believe .. they the Jews believe this crap .. They claim that they didn’t kill the Christ figure .. well this would be true, because they are not the Israelites they’re Israeli’s who believe in the Talmud and its Satanic Teachings

 

The Trouble with Trump .. Part 3 .. First 10 days .. Syria Safe Zones .. CIA Torture

The Rush for change .. first 10 days .. #Syria Safe Zones? – #CIA torture – #Russia #Sanctions on Venezuela .. #Border Wall .. BS .. Dyncorp = pedophilia/child trafficking = Steve Feinberg = Clinton foundation .. Israel + Mossad + Steve Bannon + Breitbart + Paolo Zampolli + Jeffery Epstein/Ghlislaine Maxwell = Dirt on TRUMP
➤As always please share or re-upload this video, thanks.
➤SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE

If you Don’t Think Trump is Dangerous .. You Are Not LOOKING

ZIONIST Trump .. Israel Firster .. You Can not Serve TWO MASTERS .. In service to the Owners of Israel. That would be the Rothschild’s Since 1916 when the Balfour Declaration was signed and Britain made a promise to hand over the land of Palestine to Lord Rothschild .. What happened during WWI was not just what was going on in Europe but also what was going on in Persia and North Africa. it was the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire .. this was the Bulkanization of the Ottoman Empire .. the same as we are seeing in the Persian Peninsula and North Africa ..
The Fraud known as the WAR ON TERROR Netanyahu G.H.W. Bush and other facist bankers and the sort took place in Jerusalem in 1979 called the “Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism” (JCIT)

The concept of a ‘‘war on terror’’ pre-dates 9-11 by 22 years. Its seeds were first planted in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism (JCIT) organized by Benjamin Netanyahu (future Israeli Prime Minister). JCIT kicked off a campaign for a ‘‘war on terror’’ against ‘‘international terrorism’’. It featured: pre-emptive attacks on states that are alleged to support ‘‘terrorists;’’ an elaborate intelligence system apparatus; slashed civil liberties, particularly for Palestinians targeted as potential terrorists, including detention without charge, and torture; and propaganda to dehumanize ‘‘terrorists’’ in the eyes of the public. George H.W. Bush Sr. and (…) George Schultz, Reagan’s Secretary of State enthusiastically endorsed this concept. Bush Sr. gave a speech at JCIT advocating precisely the type of ‘‘war on terror’’ that his son implemented in 2001. But he acknowledged that such a policy would be highly unpopular:

The next important thing to lookout from the JEW policies also called NEOCONS is a document called “A Clean Break – Strategy For Securing the Realm”
“A Clean Break” was to Israel (and ultimately to the US) what Otto von Bismarck’s “Blood and Iron” speech was to Germany. As he set the German Empire on a warpath that would ultimately set Europe ablaze, Bismarck said:

“Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided?—?that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849?—?but by iron and blood.”
Before setting Israel and the US on a warpath that would ultimately set the Middle East ablaze, the Clean Break authors were basically saying: Not through peace accords will the great questions of the day be decided?—?that was the great mistake of 1978 (at Camp David) and 1993 (at Oslo)?—?but by “divide and conquer” and regime change. By wars both aggressive (“preemptive”) and “dirty” (covert and proxy).

And then comes along the infamous PNAC Documents

“Rebuilding America’s Defenses” – A Summary
Blueprint of the PNAC Plan for U.S. Global Hegemony

Some people have compared it to Hitler’s publication of Mein Kampf, which was ignored until after the war was over.

Full text of Rebuilding America’s Defenses here

By Bette Stockbauer

05/06/03: When the Bush administration started lobbying for war with Iraq, they used as rationale a definition of preemption (generally meaning anticipatory use of force in the face of an imminent attack) that was broadened to allow for the waging of a preventive war in which force may be used even without evidence of an imminent attack. They also were able to convince much of the American public that Saddam Hussein had something to do with the attacks of 9/11, despite the fact that no evidence of a link has been uncovered. Consequently, many people supported the war on the basis of 1) a policy that has no legal basis in international law and 2) a totally unfounded claim of Iraqi guilt.

What most people do not know, however, is that certain high ranking officials in the Bush administration have been working for regime change in Iraq for the past decade, long before terrorism became an important issue for our country. In 1997 they formed an organization called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). They have sought the establishment of a much stronger U.S. presence throughout the Mideast and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein has been their number one target for regime change. Members of this group drafted and successfully passed through Congress the Iraqi Liberation Act, giving legal sanctions for an invasion of the country, and funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to Hussein opposition groups called the Iraqi National Congress and The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.
Don’t forget that they were looking for a “New Pearl Harbor” ..

In the summer of 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neo-conservative think tank riddled with soon to be Bush administration officials and advisors, issued a document calling for the radical restructuring of U.S. government and military policies. It advocated the massive expansion of defense spending, the re-invasion of Iraq, the military and economic securing of Afghanistan and Central Asia, increased centralized power and funds for the CIA, FBI, and NSA, among a slew of other policies that would, in the near future, be enacted upon their ascension to power. In the same document, they cite a potential problem with their plan. Referring to the goals of transforming the U.S. and global power structure, the paper states that because of the American Public’s slant toward ideas of democracy and freedom, “this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Rothschild’s Fixed the Elections with AIPAC the ISRAELI / Jewish LOBBY .. not Russia

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA .. Thats all we ever hear .. Russia hack this .. Russia didn’t Flush the Toilet .. Russia fixed the election .. Hogwash .. Rothschild’s with Israel and the Jewish Lobby AIPAC fixed the Elections .. and they have been for a long time .. and Trump was their Boy.

Also sub me at .. http://www.youtube.com/c/WardoRants1

other videos at .. https://vid.me/WARDO-RANTS

Join in on the Group .. https://seen.life/groups/viewgroup/4930-the-news-you-need-to-know

Mordechai Vanunu and Michael Collins Piper Converge: The Israeli Mossad Assassinated JFK

The Israeli Mossad Assassinated JFK

by Mark Dankof

The American news media, for all the usual and most obvious reasons, has systematically ignored the most explosive news story in years, made all the more relevant by the countdown to further conflict in the Middle East as credible rumors continue to surface that Israel and the United States are planning an act of preemptive war against Iran in coming months.

The story, which appeared in the Express Newspapers of India on Monday, July 26th, quotes Israeli nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu as crediting the Israeli Mossad with the assassination of President Kennedy. Even more incredibly, Vanunu states specifically that the motive for the assassination of Kennedy on the part of the Israeli government was related to the American President’s insistence that the Zionist State come clean about its nuclear program at the infamous Dimona plant in the Negev desert.

Vanunu was released by the Israeli authorities in April after 18 years imprisonment for a treason conviction related to the disclosure of state secrets regarding the Israelis’ nuclear program. His sensational public charge about the involvement of the Mossad in the Kennedy murder might simply be relegated to the realm of the utterances of a disgruntled or imbalanced man, except for one additional item.

Michael Collins Piper, the author of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, has made a previous case for Israel’s direct involvement in the Dealey Plaza murder of John Kennedy on November 22, 1963 that is both plausible and compelling. The Vanunu account simply underscores and corroborates the case Piper made originally over a decade ago. The converging accounts of the two men are most disturbing.

Piper tells the reader of Final Judgment that 1963 proved to be a pivotal year in a publicly unreported conflict between America’s 35th President and Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, principally over Israel’s failure to submit its Dimona operation to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection, and secondarily to a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians. He subsequently proceeds to discuss the principle alleged players in the assassination plot itself in a way which corroborates the research of such respected Kennedy assassination scholars as the UK’s Anthony Summers and University of Texas professor Jim Marrs. Readers of the work of Summers and Marrs will be intimately familiar with names like Sam Giancana, Johnny Roselli, Carlos Marcello, Guy Banister, William Harvey, William Sullivan, George de Mohrenschildt, James Jesus Angleton, Richard Helms, Alpha 66, and Santos Trafficante. Typically, the demonstrated links of these individuals with organized crime syndicates, the anti-Castro Cuban exilic community of the early 1960s, and an element of the Central Intelligence Agency involved with the first two groups, has resulted in past tentative conclusions that the crux of the plot that took Mr. Kennedy’s life involved a convergence of interest of these three (3) key constituencies involved in a sordid triumvirate deliberately concealed from the American public 40 years ago by the Warren Commission.

Piper does not discredit this conclusion reached by his predecessors in their research of the circumstances that led specific individuals to participate in a plot to kill the President. He simply demonstrates what has been hidden from view before now: that those fingered by the meticulous academic research of Summers, Marrs, and others, have even deeper demonstrable associations with the Israeli lobby and Israeli intelligence.

Final Judgment’s case in this regard is principally built on the key significance of Meyer Lansky as the real power player in American organized crime in the 1950s and 1960s, the superior of Giancana, Roselli, Marcello, Mickey Cohen, Mickey Weiner, Moe Dalitz, Frank Costello, and others previously mentioned as participants in the Kennedy conspiracy. In turn, Lansky’s role as a committed Zionist and fund-raiser for the State of Israel involved direct, palpable links between his criminal empire, his Miami-based banks, and the Banque de Credit International (BCI) in Geneva, Switzerland. This latter entity served as the European-based money laundering center for Mr. Lansky’s global activities. BCI in turn, was headed up by an Israeli banker, Tibor Rosenbaum, former Director for Finances and Supply for the Israeli Mossad. Piper then demonstrates that BCI was a chief share holder in a Rome-based corporation called CMC/Permindex, whose chairman of the board was none other than Louis M. Bloomfield of Montreal, Canada, a major fund-raiser for Israel and known asset for Israeli intelligence. CMC/Permindex, in turn, proves to be a major point of intersection which brings the shadowy Bloomfield into direct or indirect contact with Clay Shaw (the chief target of the Jim Garrison JFK investigation in New Orleans), Guy Banister, James Jesus Angleton, FBI Division 5 chief William Sullivan (who spearheaded the FBI investigation for the Warren Commission and served as FBI liaison and friend of Angleton), ex-Cuban President Carlos Prio Socarras (provable gun-running business partner of Oswald assassin Jack Ruby), Ernest Israel Japhet (chairman and president of Israeli Bank Leumi), Shaul Eisenberg (a key figure in Israel’s nuclear bomb development and participant with Rosenbaum in the Swiss-Israel Trade Bank), elements of the French nationalist Secret Army Organization (OAS), CIA agent Theodore Shackley (the CIA’s chief of station in Miami during the CIA-Lansky assassination plots against Fidel Castro), and Abe Feinberg, New York Jewish businessman used by Ben Gurion as the liaison for secret meetings with President Kennedy to resolve the dispute of the latter two over Dimona. It is thus the BCI and CMC/Permindex players and links which Piper employs to show that the players, alliances, and assets were firmly in place to bring those with motive, means, and opportunity together in a plot which culminated in Dallas.

Secondarily, Piper buttresses his case by showing the results for Israel subsequent to the tragedy in Dallas in November of 1963. The removal of Kennedy brought an end to American demands for IAEA inspections of the Israeli nuclear program, and the ascension to the White House of Lyndon Johnson, whose long ties to Meyer Lansky and Carlos Marcello had assisted the barefoot boy of the Texas Hill Country in his arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. More significantly, Johnson’s arrival in the Oval Office represented a sea change in American Middle Eastern policy, establishing for Piper the Israel-First direction of every American Chief Executive from LBJ onward, to the detriment of the independence of the American government from the undue influence of the Israeli lobby, the maintenance of regional peace and stability in the most dangerous area of the globe, and any vestiges of hope for positive American political relationships with the Islamic world.

The Vanunu-Piper allegations about Israel will not go away. The revelations of direct Israeli connections to key members of the Neo-Conservative foreign policy team of George W. Bush most desirous of conflict with Iraq; the virtual ownership of the United States Congress by the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC); and the sycophancy of John Kerry toward these same interests, will culminate in a political boiling point in the United States if an expanded American involvement in a Middle Eastern war, the re-institution of an American Draft, and further instances of Middle East-related terrorism in the American homeland end up being connected by the public to the interests of Israel and Zionism and not those of the United States. Further exposure and corroboration of the Vanunu-Piper charges that the Israeli government was the driving force behind the death of John F. Kennedy–in conjunction with further exposure of Tel Aviv’s ongoing manipulation of the American government and media in issues of War and Empire–will commence a mass revolt against the policy elites that neither Tel Aviv nor Washington will be able to contain or control.

Between now and the first Tuesday in November, the policy elites will do their best to conceal fair disclosure and debate over who controls the present process and benefits by it. Suppression of information will be their modus operandi. Bush, Kerry, and their respective pals in Corporate America and Big Media will do their best to obfuscate the truth, ignore the discussion of the core issues of War and Peace, and hide the real identity of their financiers and handlers through such information suppression. Suppressing any serious examination or dissemination of the Vanunu-Piper case against Israel is already a done deal. It is a real shame. Pity us, the “free” American Republic, that no one will ask our two Presidential aspirants some pressing questions in the days ahead, including what they think of the following Presidential document from 41 years ago.

July 5, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Levi Eshkol of Israel):

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.

You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits [i.e.: inspections] to Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27th. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s willingness to permit periodic visits [inspections] to Dimona.

I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion’s May 27th letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.

I am sure you will agree that these visits should be nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27th letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,

John F. Kennedy

Syria conflict: US urges ‘grace’ as Aleppo’s fall nears

A man on a wheelchair flees with others into the remaining rebel-held areas of Aleppo, Syria on 9 December 2016Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionMany elderly and sick people have been trapped for weeks because of the fighting

The US secretary of state has called on the Syrian government and its Russian backers to “show a little grace” as their forces close in on the remaining rebel-held area of the city of Aleppo.

John Kerry was speaking after a meeting in Paris of governments that back the Syrian opposition.

Latest reports from the city say the rebel enclave is being hit by repeated air and rocket strikes.

Civilians are said to be streaming out of the city in large numbers.

The Paris meeting on Syria was attended by officials from the US, Europe and some Arab countries.

They renewed calls for the Syrian government and Russia, whose forces are backing the government of President Bashar al-Assad, to allow people to leave Aleppo.

Russia says the exodus from the rebel-held eastern parts of Aleppo is growing amid the push by the Syrian army to regain control of the whole city.

About 50,000 civilians have fled the rebel enclave over the past two days, a Russian defence spokesman said.

He added that more than 1,000 rebels had laid down their arms as pro-government forces closed in.

Map

Mr Kerry said: “Russia and Assad have a moment where they are in a dominant position to show a little grace.

“I believe there could be a way forward but it depends on big, magnanimous choices from Russia.”

His British counterpart, Boris Johnson, said: “Although the deterioration of the situation in Aleppo will be a setback for the Syrian opposition, it will not change the fundamentals of the conflict.

“There can be no military solution in Syria. We must keep pushing for a return to a political process with the credibility necessary for all parties to commit to an end to all the fighting.”

The BBC’s Hugh Schofield in Paris says the language suggests the US government and its allies are resigned to an imminent Syrian government victory in Aleppo, and can do little more than plead for it to allow safe passage out of the city for opposition fighters.

The Russian military says the Syrian government now controls 93% of Aleppo.

The intensification in fighting in recent weeks has forced tens of thousands to seek refuge in government-controlled territory.

On Friday the UN estimated that up to 100,000 people had been squeezed into an “ever-shrinking” rebel pocket in eastern Aleppo with little or no access to food or medical care.

Syria’s government has said it is ready to resume dialogue with the opposition but without “external intervention or preconditions”.

Smoke rises from a rebel-held area of Aleppo, Syria on 9 December 2016Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionEastern Aleppo has been encircled by government-backed forces since July

Aleppo was once Syria’s largest city and its commercial and industrial hub before the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began in 2011.

It has been divided roughly in two since mid-2012. But in the past year, Syrian troops broke the deadlock with the help of Iranian-backed militias and Russian air strikes.

Elsewhere in Syria, militants from the so-called Islamic State group have been advancing on Syrian government positions in the countryside around the ancient city of Palmyra.

Robert Reyvolt Incendiary Radio + Nick Spero from Circus Maximus – POWER STRUCTURES

Dissecting Power Structures: Vatican Controlled by rothschild since 1820 –  Center on National Policy – Alex Jones the Flipped Gate Keeper Jewish Power Structure Tied to Jesuit – Catholicism – Mormonism -Mahler Refuge + Podesta and Hillary Uranium One deal .. Assange – Wikileaks co Founder Dead Scolia Death – Scientology -LRon Hubbard   ..  Bi Bi Netanyahu and his terrorist group the Likud that runs Israel – Paypal’s Peter Thiel  No business for Palestine But ok for Illegal Israeli settlers  and also donated $120 mil. to Trump

Israel F15s Could Be Engaged In False Flag Ops In Syria:

 

Israeli F15 warplanes could be engaged in false flag operations in Syria along with other aircraft flying out of Turkey to implicate Russia in war crimes, says Gordon Duff, a senior editor atVeteran Today.

Duff made the remarks in a Tuesday interview with Press TV while commenting on recently surfaced photos of American warplanes disguised in Russian camouflage, which have led to conspiracy theories about a possible false flag operation by the US to make Russia’s war on Daesh look bad in Syria.

Taken by a Canadian journalist, the photographs purport to show F/A-18 fighter jets, painted with blue patterns similar to those employed by the Russian military.

The images were released at a time that Washington and Moscow have reached a stalemate in their negotiations over Syria, giving the perfect ground to conspiracy theorists to weigh in with their extreme scenarios of a looming conflict.

Duff told Press TV that staff at the Veterans Today had failed to find evidence proving that the US is engaged in false flag operations in Syria; however, noting that such operations could be carried out by others.

“We do have reason to believe that others have done the same thing; we believe that either Israeli F15s or other planes being flown out of Turkey have attacked Syria, and have done this in false flag attacks,” said the Ohio-based analyst.

Duff, on the other hand, considered the possibility that recent reports about the US warplanes could be for training purposes.

“Whenever there’s a story like this and a photo like this comes out, it can be an accident; sometimes, it’s not,” he noted.

On September 30, 2015, Russia began air campaign against Daesh Takfiri group and other terrorists upon a request by the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The so-called coalition led by the United States has been conducting airstrikes in Syria since September 2014 without any authorization from Damascus or a UN mandate.

According to UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura, more than 400,000 people have been killed in the conflict in Syria. The UN has stopped its official casualty count in Syria, citing its inability to verify the figures it receives from various sources.

Since March 2011, Syria has been gripped by militancy it blames on some Western states and their regional allies.

Is the United Nations now given control of our country by Obama

 

Is the United Nations now given control of our country by Obama
NO NATIONALISM .. NO POPULISM .. NO SOVEREIGNTY ..
NO FREEDOM

Obama hands over US sovereignty to the Governing body of the United Nations .. “Americans need to give up the idea of Freedom, Sovereignty  and having a say as to the directions this country is heading” .. OBAMA.

Definitions of Populism.
At its root, populism is a belief in the power of regular people, and in their right to have control over their government rather than a small group of political insiders or a wealthy elite. The word populism comes from the Latin word for “people,” populus. Definitions of populism.

NATIONALISM .. Nationalism is a shared group feeling in the significance of a geographical and sometimes demographic region seeking independence for its culture or ethnicity that holds that group together.