Police’s secret cellphone-surveillance tool can also block calls by the innocent And much more!

 

Law enforcement agencies in dozens of cities and states have suitcase-sized surveillance tools that simulate cellphone towers such as this one and can track individual cellphones. But the devices can also disrupt emergency calls placed by individuals who are not being monitored. This week, a congressional committee called for legislation to set a national standard for their use. Nati Harnik AP

It’s no secret that state and local law enforcement agencies have grown more militarized in the past decade, with armored personnel carriers, drones and robots.

But one item in their arsenal has been kept largely out of public view, to the dismay of civil liberties advocates who say its use is virtually unregulated – and largely untracked.

The device is a suitcase-size surveillance tool commonly called a StingRay that mimics a cellphone tower, allowing authorities to track individual cellphones in real time. Users of the device, which include scores of law enforcement agencies across the country, sign a non-disclosure agreement when they purchase it, pledging not to divulge its use, even in court cases against defendants the device helped capture.

Those restrictions remain in place despite a decision last year by the police in Charlotte, North Carolina, to disclose to judges more details about the device’s use in criminal cases and laws in several states that require warrants whenever the device is employed.

A report this week by the House Reform and Government Oversight Committee raised new concerns about the devices’ popularity. “Cell-site simulator use inside the United States raises far-reaching issues concerning the use, extent and legality of government surveillance authority,” it said.

The FBI is one of the major users of the device. The House of Representatives report said that agency alone had more than 194 cell-site simulators in use across the country.

Yet even as the federal government has encouraged the use of the simulators, the FBI has demanded that Harris Corp., the defense contractor that manufactures the most commonly used of the devices, provide notification every time it sells a device to law enforcement agencies. In turn, the FBI requires those agencies to sign a non-disclosure agreement that blocks them from telling the public of the purchase or acknowledging the device’s use in court proceedings.

Until recently, the FBI avoided disclosing its own use of the surveillance apparatus and also “its role in assisting state and local law enforcement agencies in obtaining the devices,” the oversight committee report said.

Cell-site simulators were developed for battlefield use, allowing roving infantry teams or airborne units to track the cellphone signatures of enemy combatants and kill them.

Their civilian use has soared, however. In addition to the FBI’s 194 devices, the report found them sprinkled among federal agencies: the U.S. Marshals Service has 70, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has 59 and even the Internal Revenue Service maintains two of the electronic tools in its investigative arsenal.

The House report provided only limited details about the spread of the devices to state and local agencies. But the American Civil Liberties Union tallies 68 agencies in 23 states and the District of Columbia that have StingRay tracking devices. States with broad usage include North Carolina, Florida, Texas and California.

Even small city police departments can obtain StingRays. The police department in Sunrise, Florida, a municipality of 90,000 people northwest of Fort Lauderdale, has two, the House report said.

Much of the federal government won’t talk about use of the StingRays.

“The FBI does not comment on specific tools or techniques,” spokesman Raushaunah Muhammad said.

Harris Corp., headquartered in Melbourne, Florida, was equally reticent: “We are unable to comment for your story,” spokesman Jim Burke said

“Right now, it’s the Wild West for the use of these devices,” said Mike Katz-Lacabe, director of research at the Center for Human Rights and Privacy, a nonprofit group he founded in San Leandro, California. “We don’t know how often they are used, what they are used for and whether we’d consider such a use acceptable.”

Federal authorities have approved cell-site simulators from two companies. In addition to models of the StingRay by Harris Corp., a second branded device is commonly called a Dirtbox and is made by a Boeing Corp. subsidiary, Digital Receiver Technology Inc. of Germantown, Maryland. The House report said the devices cost between $41,500 and $500,000, depending on their capabilities.

The StingRay typically is mounted in a van and used with a directional antenna. Sometimes police chase the signal of a suspect’s known cellular phone number or go to the suspect’s location and sweep up all unknown signals. All cellphones with power in the area begin communicating with the cell-site simulator, as if it were a legitimate tower.

That is one of the concerns of civil liberties groups, that cellphones unconnected with a law enforcement investigation are also captured by the device. While some cell-site simulators allow 911 emergency calls to pass through to legitimate towers, other calls routinely fail. Should an emergency unfold, cell users in the vicinity probably would find their calls dropped or signals jammed.

“Even if there is a 911 pass-through feature, there are still plenty of other calls that people might want to make,” said Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist at the American Civil Liberties Union. “You might want to call your children’s school. You might want to call your wife or husband.”

Police with little training can use the cell-site simulators and affect all phones in a given area while looking for single individuals, he said. Poor minority communities, where many residents have ditched landlines, are disproportionately affected, he added.

It’s hard to know with certainty how many innocent cellphone users have experienced jamming due to police use of cell-site simulators. Federal restrictions on information about their use prevents collecting such details.

“There are real privacy interests at stake when the government sends probing electronic signals into the homes of innocent people. These devices cannot be used in a way that only enters the home of the target,” Soghoian said.

THIS IS NOT A SCALPEL. IT IS A SHOTGUN.Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist at the American Civil Liberties Union

EXCLUSIVE: STINGRAY MAKER ASKED FCC TO BLOCK RELEASE OF SPY GEAR MANUAL

 

A StingRay is a radio interception device that, when deployed, forces cellphones in a given area to connect to it instead of a legitimate communications tower. A computer attached to a StingRay allows investigators access to a trove of data from intercepted cellphones, including call and messaging logs, geolocation data and handset information.

A KingFish is a less-expensive, more-portable version of a StingRay. Some records indicate that, while a StingRay is intended to be mounted in and controlled from a vehicle, a KingFish can be remotely controlled and can even be worn by its user.

Records reviewed by TheBlot reveal Harris first began manufacturing the devices for use by U.S. military analysts in the early 2000s. One of the company’s earliest buyers of cellphone spy equipment was the U.S. Navy, which could explain how the Harris-made surveillance gear got its aquatic nicknames.

 

After the Murder of Rolling Stone Journalist Michael Hasings, I ran across Information regarding Stingray Systems By Harris Corporation

 In my opinion, this was the very technology was used to assume control of His which was ran into a palm tree in the Hollywood area after a bomb exploded from underneath And was caught on film.

Michael had already ruffled some feathers in Washington DC when one of his stories got top Obama Fired. Michael was not finished .. according to Michael himself he had an even bigger story and was getting ready to release it when on the Day of his death told many friends that he was being followed by the FBI and he was worried for his life.

Here is a talk show I did with Erin Dakins last year talking about this technology and other capabilities I believe it has

In Spring of 2015 I was involve with the Miners doing battle against the BLM. A mirror image of what the Bundy’s went through with the BLM the prior year in Nevada. This time they were trying to steal Land/claims on Gold Mines

During an interview with the miners they slipped up and admitted that the Oath Keepers were using Stringray technology at the mine during the standoff

Obama Admins scurries to flip script

obama motorcade sxsw

Obama regime positions to retain power, stay in office, as shitstorm develops

Obama Admins scurries to flip script

(INTELLIHUB) — Major coordinated attacks on the President-elect’s character and judgement have been launched as of late Friday night, after the New York Times and Washington Post both released major disinformation pieces, citing how the C.I.A. has ruled with “high confidence” that the Russians helped sway the elections, creating Trump’s win.

Astonishingly, I predicted this exact scenario just an hour or more before the bombshell propaganda pieces were released, which can be seen in the following Tweet. (Click on the Tweet to see full context)

Now the C.I.A. is claiming that the Republican National Committee was hacked by the Russians in addition to the already purported Democratic National Committee hack, leading the Intelligence operatives to “believe” that the information was intentionally withheld by Wikileaks and or the Russians, which they claim thrusted Trump into the presidency.

Although it has also been reported that one senior government official had been briefed by the F.B.I. who found that attempts to penetrate the R.N.C. were unsuccessful, the C.I.A. is now claiming the opposite, in an attempt by the Obama Admin to flip the script.

Now the C.I.A. is claiming that the Republican National Committee was hacked by the Russians in addition to the already purported Democratic National Committee hack, leading the Intelligence operatives to “believe” that the information was intentionally withheld by Wikileaks and or the Russians, which they claim thrusted Trump into the presidency.

Although it has also been reported that one senior government official had been briefed by the F.B.I. who found that attempts to penetrate the R.N.C. were unsuccessful, the C.I.A. is now claiming the opposite, in an attempt by the Obama Admin to flip the script.

Additionally the New York Times reported:

“In briefings to the White House and Congress, intelligence officials, including those from the C.I.A. and the National Security Agency, have identified individual Russian officials they believe were responsible. But none have been publicly penalized.”

The New York Times went on to purport the following ‘fake news’ Friday, using haphazard terminology, which offers the publication an out, carefully writing how “cybersecurity companies believe”, meaning they actually have no proof they just “believe.” Just a play on words to push the new and patently false narrative.

Intelligence officials and private cybersecurity companies believe that the Democratic National Committee was hacked by two different Russian cyberunits. One, called “Cozy Bear” or “A.P.T. 29” by some Western security experts, is believed to have spent months inside the D.N.C. computer network, as well as other government and political institutions, but never made public any of the documents it took. (A.P.T. stands for “Advanced Persistent Threat,” which usually describes a sophisticated state-sponsored cyberintruder.)

The other, the G.R.U.-controlled unit known as “Fancy Bear,” or “A.P.T. 28,” is believed to have created two outlets on the internet, Guccifer 2.0 and DCLeaks, to make Democratic documents public. Many of the documents were also provided to WikiLeaks, which released them over many weeks before the Nov. 8 election.

In light of the recent propaganda push, President Obama has ordered Intelligence agencies to submit a report before he leaves office on Jan. 20, which Obama may potentially use to stay in power by declaring the elections were rigged.

The President-elect is rejecting claims of Russian espionage, saying, “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction,” which led to war and the deaths of over 600,000 people, according to a Lancet Survey.

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, filmmaker, radio talk show host and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics. Established in 2013, Intellihub.com is ranked in the upper 1% traffic tier on the World Wide Web. Read more from Shep’s World. Get the Podcast. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.

The Feds CIA & HILLARY TIES to ORLANDO & Islamic Terrorist

Hillary Clinton And her Aid Huma Mahmood Abedin .. Direct ties to Orlando Shooting .. Trump Failed Assassin Michael Sandford .. Al Qaeda training Camps here in the US along with the White House, CIA, DHS, FBI .. Along with direct ties with The Saudi Government and Terror from abroad