If you Don’t Think Trump is Dangerous .. You Are Not LOOKING

ZIONIST Trump .. Israel Firster .. You Can not Serve TWO MASTERS .. In service to the Owners of Israel. That would be the Rothschild’s Since 1916 when the Balfour Declaration was signed and Britain made a promise to hand over the land of Palestine to Lord Rothschild .. What happened during WWI was not just what was going on in Europe but also what was going on in Persia and North Africa. it was the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire .. this was the Bulkanization of the Ottoman Empire .. the same as we are seeing in the Persian Peninsula and North Africa ..
The Fraud known as the WAR ON TERROR Netanyahu G.H.W. Bush and other facist bankers and the sort took place in Jerusalem in 1979 called the “Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism” (JCIT)

The concept of a ‘‘war on terror’’ pre-dates 9-11 by 22 years. Its seeds were first planted in 1979 at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism (JCIT) organized by Benjamin Netanyahu (future Israeli Prime Minister). JCIT kicked off a campaign for a ‘‘war on terror’’ against ‘‘international terrorism’’. It featured: pre-emptive attacks on states that are alleged to support ‘‘terrorists;’’ an elaborate intelligence system apparatus; slashed civil liberties, particularly for Palestinians targeted as potential terrorists, including detention without charge, and torture; and propaganda to dehumanize ‘‘terrorists’’ in the eyes of the public. George H.W. Bush Sr. and (…) George Schultz, Reagan’s Secretary of State enthusiastically endorsed this concept. Bush Sr. gave a speech at JCIT advocating precisely the type of ‘‘war on terror’’ that his son implemented in 2001. But he acknowledged that such a policy would be highly unpopular:

The next important thing to lookout from the JEW policies also called NEOCONS is a document called “A Clean Break – Strategy For Securing the Realm”
“A Clean Break” was to Israel (and ultimately to the US) what Otto von Bismarck’s “Blood and Iron” speech was to Germany. As he set the German Empire on a warpath that would ultimately set Europe ablaze, Bismarck said:

“Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided?—?that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849?—?but by iron and blood.”
Before setting Israel and the US on a warpath that would ultimately set the Middle East ablaze, the Clean Break authors were basically saying: Not through peace accords will the great questions of the day be decided?—?that was the great mistake of 1978 (at Camp David) and 1993 (at Oslo)?—?but by “divide and conquer” and regime change. By wars both aggressive (“preemptive”) and “dirty” (covert and proxy).

And then comes along the infamous PNAC Documents

“Rebuilding America’s Defenses” – A Summary
Blueprint of the PNAC Plan for U.S. Global Hegemony

Some people have compared it to Hitler’s publication of Mein Kampf, which was ignored until after the war was over.

Full text of Rebuilding America’s Defenses here

By Bette Stockbauer

05/06/03: When the Bush administration started lobbying for war with Iraq, they used as rationale a definition of preemption (generally meaning anticipatory use of force in the face of an imminent attack) that was broadened to allow for the waging of a preventive war in which force may be used even without evidence of an imminent attack. They also were able to convince much of the American public that Saddam Hussein had something to do with the attacks of 9/11, despite the fact that no evidence of a link has been uncovered. Consequently, many people supported the war on the basis of 1) a policy that has no legal basis in international law and 2) a totally unfounded claim of Iraqi guilt.

What most people do not know, however, is that certain high ranking officials in the Bush administration have been working for regime change in Iraq for the past decade, long before terrorism became an important issue for our country. In 1997 they formed an organization called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). They have sought the establishment of a much stronger U.S. presence throughout the Mideast and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein has been their number one target for regime change. Members of this group drafted and successfully passed through Congress the Iraqi Liberation Act, giving legal sanctions for an invasion of the country, and funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to Hussein opposition groups called the Iraqi National Congress and The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.
Don’t forget that they were looking for a “New Pearl Harbor” ..

In the summer of 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neo-conservative think tank riddled with soon to be Bush administration officials and advisors, issued a document calling for the radical restructuring of U.S. government and military policies. It advocated the massive expansion of defense spending, the re-invasion of Iraq, the military and economic securing of Afghanistan and Central Asia, increased centralized power and funds for the CIA, FBI, and NSA, among a slew of other policies that would, in the near future, be enacted upon their ascension to power. In the same document, they cite a potential problem with their plan. Referring to the goals of transforming the U.S. and global power structure, the paper states that because of the American Public’s slant toward ideas of democracy and freedom, “this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Did Satellites Expose A Secret American Drone Hangar In A Saudi Desert?

Buried deep in the heart of one of the most barren deserts in Saudi Arabia, and the entire planet for that matter, a commercial satellite happened upon what appears to be a very modern airport that suddenly appeared out of thin air from one year to the next.  What makes the airport even more mysterious is the fact that there are no planes on site and no government claims ownership of the facility.  So, is this airport a mere “Border Guard” facility, as Google Maps would suggest, or did this satellite just happen to reveal the location of a secret U.S. military airport used to conduct drone operations in Yemen?

Certainly, the proximity to the Yemen border would make this an ideal location for drone operations.

Saudi Airport

And it does seem somewhat odd that such a massive airport, with 3 large hangars, would be required to conduct “border operations.”  Moreover, while we understand that the Saudi border police are probably using some pretty sophisticated prop planes to conduct their operations, it does seem a bit odd that not a single plane would be visible at the airport.

Saudi

While we may never know the true owner/function of this mysterious facility, we’re almost certain that Russia hackers are behind the leak of it’s location.

Syria conflict: US urges ‘grace’ as Aleppo’s fall nears

A man on a wheelchair flees with others into the remaining rebel-held areas of Aleppo, Syria on 9 December 2016Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionMany elderly and sick people have been trapped for weeks because of the fighting

The US secretary of state has called on the Syrian government and its Russian backers to “show a little grace” as their forces close in on the remaining rebel-held area of the city of Aleppo.

John Kerry was speaking after a meeting in Paris of governments that back the Syrian opposition.

Latest reports from the city say the rebel enclave is being hit by repeated air and rocket strikes.

Civilians are said to be streaming out of the city in large numbers.

The Paris meeting on Syria was attended by officials from the US, Europe and some Arab countries.

They renewed calls for the Syrian government and Russia, whose forces are backing the government of President Bashar al-Assad, to allow people to leave Aleppo.

Russia says the exodus from the rebel-held eastern parts of Aleppo is growing amid the push by the Syrian army to regain control of the whole city.

About 50,000 civilians have fled the rebel enclave over the past two days, a Russian defence spokesman said.

He added that more than 1,000 rebels had laid down their arms as pro-government forces closed in.

Map

Mr Kerry said: “Russia and Assad have a moment where they are in a dominant position to show a little grace.

“I believe there could be a way forward but it depends on big, magnanimous choices from Russia.”

His British counterpart, Boris Johnson, said: “Although the deterioration of the situation in Aleppo will be a setback for the Syrian opposition, it will not change the fundamentals of the conflict.

“There can be no military solution in Syria. We must keep pushing for a return to a political process with the credibility necessary for all parties to commit to an end to all the fighting.”

The BBC’s Hugh Schofield in Paris says the language suggests the US government and its allies are resigned to an imminent Syrian government victory in Aleppo, and can do little more than plead for it to allow safe passage out of the city for opposition fighters.

The Russian military says the Syrian government now controls 93% of Aleppo.

The intensification in fighting in recent weeks has forced tens of thousands to seek refuge in government-controlled territory.

On Friday the UN estimated that up to 100,000 people had been squeezed into an “ever-shrinking” rebel pocket in eastern Aleppo with little or no access to food or medical care.

Syria’s government has said it is ready to resume dialogue with the opposition but without “external intervention or preconditions”.

Smoke rises from a rebel-held area of Aleppo, Syria on 9 December 2016Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionEastern Aleppo has been encircled by government-backed forces since July

Aleppo was once Syria’s largest city and its commercial and industrial hub before the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad began in 2011.

It has been divided roughly in two since mid-2012. But in the past year, Syrian troops broke the deadlock with the help of Iranian-backed militias and Russian air strikes.

Elsewhere in Syria, militants from the so-called Islamic State group have been advancing on Syrian government positions in the countryside around the ancient city of Palmyra.

Media Silent as House Passes Resolution for Syrian No-Fly Zone — Provoking War with Russia

Hillary Clinton’s loss was a shock to the purveyors of U.S. military hegemony, who saw in her an easier path to keep the Syria conflict going. Secretary of State Clinton was instrumental in the early days of Syria intervention, in 2010 making a series of demands for Syria to get in line behind the U.S. vision for the Middle East. Image result for syria no fly zone

When Bashar al-Assad refused to roll over, regime change became the talking point of Washington think tanks and mainstream media echo chambers. Clinton promised during her campaign to ramp up action in Syria, to the delight of the same neocons who brought the Iraq invasion. She acknowledged that many civilians would die if the U.S. set up a no-fly zone.

Establishment of a no-fly zone is the next crucial step toward full-scale war. It would mean Syrian planes could not fly in their own airspace and would bring the disturbing prospect of U.S. planes shooting down Russian planes — which are operating there on invitation from Syria to help battle ISIS.

Soon after the presidential election, key warmongers in Congress began formulating plans to make increased conflict a near certainty, complete with the kind of propaganda peddled before the Iraq attack. While everyone was distracted by the election of Trump, six representatives took advantage of the lame-duck session and suspended “normal rules” to bring us H.R. 5732.

The Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2016 includes Section 303, titled: Assessment of potential effectiveness of and requirements for the establishment of safe zones or a no-fly zone in Syria.

Late in the day, on Nov. 15, one week after the U.S. elections, the lame-duck Congress convened in special session with normal rules suspended so the House could pass House Resolution 5732, the “Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act” calling for intensifying the already harsh sanctions on Syria, assessing the imposition of a “no fly zone” inside Syria (to prevent the Syrian government from flying) and escalating efforts to press criminal charges against Syrian officials…

Most strikingly, the resolution calls for evaluating and developing plans for the United States to impose a “no fly zone” inside Syria, a sovereign nation, an act of war that also would violate international law as an act of aggression. It also could put the U.S. military in the position of shooting down Russian aircraft.

The suspension of rules procedure is supposed to be used for “non-controversial” bills such as naming Post Offices, but this small group of lawmakers used it to pass a drastically important bill. The blatant abuse of power shows the desperation in the neocon ranks.

Donald Trump has spoken out against regime change, but considering his unpredictable behavior, the actual position of his coming administration is anybody’s guess. Trump’s pick of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn as national security adviser is not a good portent.

Earlier this month, Flynn strongly supported Turkish President Erdogan in an op-ed at The Hill, suggesting he is under siege by “radical Islam” and desperately needs our help. Flynn seemed to dismiss Erdogan’s crackdown on political dissidents and the dubious circumstances of the attempted coup which allowed Erdogan to solidify his power.

It may be no coincidence that just days ago, Turkey — a NATO ally — urged to U.S. to move forward with a no-fly zone in Syria. Incidentally, no one seems to have paid attention to a damning investigative report finding that the “Turkish government under President Erdogan is covertly providing direct military, financial and logistical support to ISIS, even while claiming to fight the terror network.”

While both Russian and U.S. bombings have resulted in civilian deaths, completely missing in the Western narrative on Syria is how U.S. intervention in the interest of regime change was the catalyst for today’s hellish conditions in that country, and the resulting flood of Syrian refugees.

As we have reported before, the Pentagon nurtured the Salafist sect in eastern Syria — to help the U.S. and its allies achieve regime change – and these extremists went on to become the violent terror group called ISIS.

 

n order to keep the American public ignorant of reality in Syria, and to maintain the specter of terrorism in order to justify massive military spending, politicians’ propaganda must be so complete they believe it themselves.

This was demonstrated during the 40-minute “debate” session among the six lawmakers who pushed the bill through.

They claimed the Obama administration has been “sitting back and doing nothing” as violence worsens, and Assad is “killing millions of his citizens.” All of this is, of course, false.

 

“By late 2011, the U.S. was actively coordinating, training and supplying armed opposition groups. When Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan government was toppled in fall 2011, the CIA oversaw the diversion of Libyan weapons to the Syrian armed opposition, as documented in the Defense Intelligence Agency report of October 2012.

These weapons transfers were secret. For the public record, it was acknowledged that the U.S. was supplying communications equipment to the armed opposition while U.S. “allies” — Saudi Arabia and Qatar — were supplying the weaponry. This is one reason that Saudi purchases of weapons skyrocketed during this time period; they were buying weapons to replace those being shipped to the armed opposition in Syria. It was very profitable for U.S. arms manufacturers.

Huge weapons transfers to the armed opposition in Syria have continued to the present, with the U.S. government even more directly involved. This past spring, Janes Defense reported the details of a U.S. delivery of 2.2 million pounds of ammunition, rocket launchers and other weaponry to the armed opposition.

So, the political claims that the U.S. has been inactive are baseless. In reality, the U.S. has done everything short of a direct attack on Syria. And the U.S. military is starting to cross that line. On Sept. 17, the U.S. air coalition conducted a series of airstrikes on the Syrian Army in Deir Ezzor, killing 80 Syrian soldiers and enabling ISIS to launch an attack on the position. Claims that it was a “mistake” are highly dubious.”

 

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights estimates the actual death toll as: “killed pro-Syrian forces – 108,000; killed anti-government forces – 105,000; killed civilians – 89,000.

In no way is this downplaying the significance of these horrible deaths at the hands of warring forces. But it is extremely important to point out the highly exaggerate claims of U.S. politicians in their push to bring even more death and destruction to Syria.

The Friends Committee for National Legislation analyzed House Resolution 5732 and found it would make a peace agreement more difficult, not less.

Any peace agreement that leaves Bashar al-Assad in power would be seen as a failure of U.S. hegemonic foreign policy, which has pushed regime change for years. It would also be seen as a victory for Russia, which is helping Assad fight ISIS and U.S.-funded “moderate rebels” attempting to overthrown Assad.

Even the title of the resolution — ‘Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act’ – is based on a CIA-funded propaganda hoax involving alleged torture photos that was used to sabotage a 2014 effort at peace negotiations.

Unsurprisingly, the Israel lobby is campaigning for the passage of HR5732, as Israel is officially at war with Syria and continues to illegally occupy the Syrian Golan Heights. Removing Assad would make things easier for Israel to permanently seize this fossil fuel-rich area, and would strike a blow to its perceived enemies in Lebanon and Iran.

Despite the grave ramifications of HR 5732, the media is silent. The media outlets now professing to hold the monopoly on real journalism have not said a word about the shocking abuse of “suspended rules” in the House, and the utter propaganda being spewed out by lawmakers, to save their crusade for regime change in Syria — even if it means World War III.

 

911 Attacks Historical Documentation of Planning .. Jewish Israeli’s Responsible

 

– 911 ATTACKS – 15 YEARS AGO

Going back as far as 1979 there is documentation showing that the Israeli government has had plans to have the US fight their battles and fracture the entire middle east. Using the War on Terror as the force as a tool and the events of the False Flag of 911 as the driving force and the Psyop of 911 to get the American people to go along with the invasion of the entire middle east .. At the death of JFK a Coup D’ etat in the US government was set in place and with the event of 911, this faction during the Bush administration took full control of US foreign policy. This group is know as NEOCONSERVATIVES .. aka Dual National Israeli’s. Aided with the money of AIPAC and the theft of Trillions of US tax payers moneys, these conspirators managed to pull off the Biggest crime in history.

People are waking up to the fact that it was factions within our own government .. known as dual national Israeli’s and the Mossad that pulled off the attack on America September 11, 2001 .. Its time for the People to stand against this tyranny and bring these criminals to justice. This was the catalyst that brought the American people and the US war machine to fight Israel’s enemies in the middle east.
PERP LIST: (Most of who are JEWISH) .. Larry Silverstien, Frank Lowey, Entire Bush Crime Family, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Chertoff, Richard Perl, Morton I. Abramowitz, Elliott Abrams, Gordon Adams, Ken Adelman, Urban Ahlin, Madeleine K. Albright, Richard V. Allen, Giuliano Amato, Mark A. Anderson, Uzi Arad, Richard Armitage, Anders Aslund, Ronald Asmus, Andrew Y. Au, Maureen Aung-Thwin, Nina Bang-Jensen, Gary Bauer, Rafael L. Bardaji, Roger Barnett , Carolyn Bartholomew, Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, Arnold Beichman, Peter Beinart, Jeffrey Bell, William J. Bennett, Jeffrey Bergner, Alvin Bernstein, Robert L. Bernstein, George Biddle, Joseph R. Biden, Carl Bildt, Daniel Blumenthal, John Bolton, Max Boot, Ellen Bork, Rudy Boshwitz, Pascal Bruckner, Mark Brzezinski, William F. Buckley, Jr., Reinhard Buetikofer, Janusz Bugajski, Jeb Bush, Michael Butler, Martin Butora, Stephen Cambone, Daniele Capezzone, Per Carlsen, Gunilla Carlsson, Frank Carlucci, James W. Ceasar, Linda Chavez, Richard B. Cheney, Steven C. Clemons, Eliot A. Cohen, Seth Cropsey, Devon Gaffney Cross, Ivo H. Daalder, Massimo D’Alema, Helle Dale, Dennis DeConcini, Midge Decter x, Pavol Demes,
Larry Diamond, Peter Dimitrov, James Dobbins, Paula Dobriansky, Thomas Donnelly, Nicholas Eberstadt, Robert Edgar, Uffe Elleman-Jensen, David Epstein, Amitai Etzioni, David Fautua, Lee Feinstein, Edwin J. Feulner, Jr., Jeffrey L. Fiedler, Michele Flournoy, Steve Forbes,
Hillel Fradkin, Aaron Friedberg, Francis Fukuyama , Frank Gaffney, Peter Galbraith, Timothy Garton Ash, Jeffrey Gedmin, Sam Gejdenson, Robert S. Gelbard, Reuel Marc Gerecht, Bronislaw Geremek, Carl Gershmann, Marc Ginsberg, Andre Glucksmann, Lt.Gen. Buster Glosson (UASF, ret), Merle Goldman , Phillip Gordon, Daniel Goure, Karl-Theodor von und zu Guttenberg, Istvan Gyarmati, Morton H. Halperin ,
Pierre Hassner, Vaclav Havel, John Hefferman, Richard C. Holbrooke, James R. Hooper, Charles Hill, Fred C. Ikle, Martin S. Indyk,
Toomas Ilves, Bruce P. Jackson, Eli S. Jacobs, Michael Joyce, Donald Kagan, Frederick Kagan, Robert Kagan, Max M. Kampelman,
Adrian Karatnycky, Penn Kemble, Craig Kennedy, Zalmay Khalilzad, Glenys Kinnock, Bernard Kouchner, Jerzy Kozminski, Ivan Krastev,
Harold Hongju Koh, Col. Robert Killebrew (Army, ret), Lane Kirkland, Jeane Kirkpatrick
Peter Kovler, Louis Kraar, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol, Girts Valdis Kristovskis, Ludger Kuehnhardt, Mart Laar, Mark Lagon, Anthony Lake, Vytautas Landsbergis, Stephen Larrabee, James Lasswell, John Lehman, Lewis E. Lehrman, Mark Leonard, Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, I. Lewis Libby, Todd Lindberg, James Lindsay , Perry Link, Bette Bao Lord, Rich Lowry, Connie Mack,
Christopher Makins, Christopher Maletz, Tom Malinowski, James Mann, Yu Mao-chun, Mary Beth Markey,
Will Marshall , Robert Martinage, Margarita Mathiopoulos, Clifford May, John McCain, Gen. Barry McCaffery (Army, ret), Michael McFaul
Daniel McKivergan, Matteo Mecacci, Mark Medish, Edwin Meese III, Thomas O. Melia, Sarah E. Mendelson, Phil Meilinger,
Michael Mertes, Ilir Meta, Adam Michnik, Derek Mitchell, Richard Morningstar, Ross H. Munro, Joshua Muravchik, Klaus Naumann,
Wing C. Ng, Steven J. Nider, Dietmar Nietan, James C. O’Brien, Michael O’Hanlon, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Mackubin Thomas Owens, Wayne Owens, Cem Ozdemir, Can Paker, Mark Palmer, Robert Pastor, Martin Peretz, Richard N. Perle, Ralph Peters, Friedbert Pflueger, Daniel Pipes, Danielle Pletka, Norman Podhoretz, John Edward Porter, Florentino Portero, Dan Quayle, Samantha F. Ravich, Janusz Reiter
Sophie Richardson, Peter W. Rodman, Alex Rondos, Jim Rosapepe, Stephen P. Rosen, Dennis Ross, Kenneth Roth, Henry S. Rowen, Donald Rumsfeld, Jacques Rupnik, Eberhard Sandschneider, Major Gen. Robert Scales (Army, ret), Randy Scheunemann,
Christian Schmidt, Gary Schmitt, William Schneider Jr. Richard H. Schultz, Simon Serfaty, Stephen Sestanovich, John Shattuck ,
Sin-Ming Shaw, Abram Shulsky, Gary Smith, Martin Simecka, Radek Sikorski, Paul Simon, Stefano Silvestri, Abraham Sofaer,
Henry Sokolski, Helmut Sonnenfeldt, Walter Slocombe, James B. Steinberg, Leonard R. Sussman, John J. Sweeney,
William Howard Taft IV, Dick Thornburgh, Gary Titley, John Tkacik, Helga Flores Trejo, Ed Turner, Ivan Vejvoda, Sasha Vondra,
Michael Vickers, Arthur Waldron, Celeste Wallander, Malcolm Wallop, Barry Watts, James Webb, Vin Weber, Ruth Wedgwood,
George Weigel, Caspar Weinberger, Kenneth Weinstein, Richard Weitz, Paul Weyrich, Leon Wieseltier, Chris Williams, Jennifer Windsor, Marshall Wittmann, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, Minky Worden, Larry Wortzel, Dov S. Zakheim, Robert Zoellick, .. IF I MISSED ANYONE FROM THIS LIST PLEASE ADD THEM IN COMMENTS AREA

Libyan War – The Truth

 

Nick Spero – Circus Maximus: speaks with James and Joanne Moriarty along with a Libyan tribal leader by the name of Muftah Faraj about their story in Libya, their escape and how they were blacklisted by American intelligence agencies, the greatness of Libya and their leader Muammar Gaddafi, Western sanctions & the invasion, Benghazi incident and the various proxy armies involved with the destruction & destabilization.

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/circus-maximus-libyan-war-truth-8-26-16/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=google_plus&utm_source=socialnetwork

 

Saudi Airstrikes Destroy Yemen House, Kill 17 Civilians

Warplanes Attacked Relatives Trying to Rescue Victims of First Attack

by Jason Ditz, August 16, 2016

For the third straight day, Saudi Arabia’s warplanes are caught up in a high-profile incident of civilian deaths in Yemen, this time attacking a house in the Nehm District near the capital of Sanaa. The attacks destroyed a house, and killed 17 civilians.

The large toll for a single home was the result of a “double-tap” incident, with the first strike collapsing the house on top of the family, and relatives from the neighborhood scrambling to try to rescue them, only for the rescuers themselves to be targeted in subsequent strikes.

This comes after a Sunday incident in which Saudi warplanes attacked a school, killing 10 children, and a Monday incident in which they destroyed a Doctors Without Borders hospital, killing 15 more civilians. Throughout the war the Saudis have been criticized for the huge civilian toll of their airstrikes, but the number of incidents seems to be growing dramatically in recent weeks.

With the UN General Assembly last year agreeing the Saudis could investigate themselves on war crimes, the coalition today announced they’ll set up an investigatory body to look into the recent strikes, though Saudi officials have already praised the killing of the children at the school, accusing them of being terrorists in training. So far, Saudi officials have justified every single incident of civilian killings in Yemen, or insisted they didn’t happen at all.

“More US government-enabled Saudi serial genocide against the Yemenite people!!

The country I used to think I knew, and loved, has slowly morphed into a war crimes perpetrator and enabler, wielding destruction around the world to insure that the world’s resources are under the control of the corporations which contribute to the campaigns of crooked US politicians, and to guarantee that those resources are only sold in US dollars.

At our ages, Mike and I are way too old – and poor – to immigrate; but if we could, right now, we would.

The US government has completely lost what used to be its moral vision, which included a disciplined view of how, and when, it used its military clout, and has simply devolved into a criminal enterprise of gigantic proportions.

And with its “the ends justifies the means” mentality which the US government has adopted, the slaughter of civilians and children, in this horrific war, to reinstall their favorite thug here, Al-Hadi, is perfectly acceptable.

As a Christian pacifist activist, who abhors violence as the way to resolve geopolitical disputes, I must, peacefully, continue to witness to the atrocities the US government keeps generating, in its battle for dollar hegemony.

In the Hindu faith, there is the concept of “Karma”, which means, you will ultimately be spiritually responsible for what you do; in Christianity, we are admonished that “Ye reap what ye shall sow.”

Right now, the US government is sowing war and devastation; and for that, there will be consequences, both economic…and spiritual.”

DOCUMENTS CONFIRM CIA CENSORSHIP OF GUANTÁNAMO TRIALS

 

“Why in the name of heaven is the US military torturing when they know that the tortured person will say anything his torturers want him to say to get the torture to stop?!?

Because this wasn’t about what the tortured had done or not done; it was about eliciting confessions with which to justify the continued use torture.

I would like to politely remind our military and civilian leadership that when we, as a country, torture, or outsource torture, we demonstrate to the world that Americans are complete, abysmal hypocrites when it comes human rights, democracy, and the moral treatment of prisoners of war.

And I would also like to politely remind our military and civilian leadership that when we, as a country, torture, or outsource torture, this gives carte blanche for foreign countries which really don’t like the American government that much, to torture our civilian and military personnel.”

Please do take a moment to reflect on that, won’t you?!

hqdefault

 

IN JANUARY 2013, during the military trial of five men accused of plotting the 9/11 attacks, a defense lawyer was discussing a motion relating to the CIA’s black-site program, when a mysterious entity cut the audio feed to the gallery. A red light began to glow and spin. Someone had triggered the courtroom’s censorship system.

The system was believed to be under the control of the judge, Col. James Pohl. In this case, it wasn’t.

“The 40-second delay was initiated, not by me,” Pohl said. He was referring to the delayed audio feed, which normally broadcasts to the press and other observers seated in the gallery. The gallery is cut off from the courtroom by three layers of soundproof Plexiglas. “I’m curious as to why. … If some external body is turning the commission off under their own view of what things ought to be, with no reasonable explanation, then we are going to have a little meeting about who turns that light on or off.”

Later, Pohl said the censorship was the work of an “OCA,” short for “Original Classification Authority.” In the future, he said, no external body would be permitted to unilaterally censor what was happening in his courtroom.

Many have speculated that Pohl’s “OCA” is in fact the CIA. That speculation is now confirmed with the release of three new documents by The Intercept.The documents show the evolution of secret rules governing what is and is not allowed to be discussed before the military court at Guantánamo.

All three of the declassified documents are marked “secret” and were distributed to defense attorneys and Pentagon-employed courtroom security officers. The documents clearly identify CIA as the OCA for torture-related information at the Guantánamo military commission proceedings.

Dean Boyd, who heads the CIA’s public affairs office, referred questions about the January 2013 censorship incident to the Pentagon. Lt. Col. Valerie Henderson, a Pentagon spokesperson, declined to comment. “I don’t have anything to offer you beyond what is written in [the court] transcript,” she said.

This page from a 2008 CIA guidance document designates as top secret the “treatment of detainees,” their “conditions of confinement,” and certain “false allegations of torture,” which were later shown to have merit.

Another CIA spokesperson confirmed the dates of the guidance, which are not given in two of the three documents.The first guidance document is from spring of 2008.

The second document is from late spring or early summer of 2009.

The third document is from September 2011.

The Intercept obtained the documents through an ongoing Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the CIA and other federal agencies. Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic is providing legal representation for the request.

The term “OCA” is a placeholder that can refer to multiple agencies, but with respect to the rendition and torture program, Guantánamo observers have assumed for some time that it means the CIA. A defense lawyerasserted the connection in open court, and it has previously been hinted at in several other documents. At the end of January 2013, Judge Pohl issued a ruling declaring that there would be no more outside censorship of the tribunals. “It is the judge that controls the courtroom,” he said.

The courtroom’s internal censorship system, including the Plexiglas and audio delay, continues to this day. But assuming Judge Pohl’s order is enforced, the CIA no longer has the power to decide when to cut the courtroom audio, as it did in January 2013.

“The Department of the Defense runs the courtroom, but CIA owns a lot of the information,” said attorney James Connell III, who is representing Ammar al-Baluchi before the tribunal. Baluchi, whose torture at multiple overseas black sites was depicted in the film Zero Dark Thirty, is one of five men who stand accused of plotting the 9/11 attacks and now face the death penalty.

What appears to be a 2015 version of a similar CIA guidance document was released by OpenTheGovernment.org last year. Unlike the older guidance documents released by The Intercept today, the sections addressing the CIA’s black-site and rendition programs are completely redacted.

The CIA calls its classification rules “guidelines … to be applied throughout the legal process.” They are intended to provide the Pentagon-employed court security officers with “general direction about when national security information may be at issue, … triggering the need for protection.”

Much of what the CIA sought to keep out of open court effectively constrained the detainees’ ability to give an account of their own torture at the hands of the CIA and officials from other countries where they were held.

At first, these prohibitions were broad, but they grew narrower over time. The oldest guidance document, from 2008, prohibits talking about “conditions of confinement of detainees” and “treatment of detainees,” although “general allegations of torture are unclassified.” By this time, the CIA had released three of the names of detainees subjected to waterboarding. Though the CIA continues to insist those three were the only ones waterboarded, the claim is tenuous at best. According to the 2008 guidance, no other detainee could talk about waterboarding. Anyone who did, wrote the CIA, was lying, and even the existence of those lies was secret.

“Allegations of waterboarding by any detainees other than the three … are false allegations and are TS//SCI,” the guidance states.

In other words, even the alleged lies of other detainees who claimed to have been waterboarded were designated top secret and “sensitive compartmentalized information,” a higher-level classification than top secret alone. And yet many of these allegations, which the CIA’s guidance kept out of the tribunals for years, were later shown to have merit.

“In effect, the government was making the chilling and breathtaking assertion that it owned and controlled detainees’ memories of torture, whether true or false,” said Ashley Gorski, a staff attorney with the ACLU, who reviewed the newly released guidance documents.

“We stand by the document,” Dean Boyd, director of the CIA’s public affairs office, wrote in an email.

The 2008 guidance identifies CIA’s own “Original Classification Authority” as having the power to declassify statements by detainees. Other officials and agencies likely have some say as well. The 2011 and 2009 guidance say that the president and director of national intelligence can also declassify information related to the torture program; the 2008 guidance suggests that the power was delegated even further.

Seventy-six men are still held at Guantánamo. Sixteen are “forever prisoners,” who have not been charged by the court but are considered too dangerous to be candidates for release. President Obama’s self-imposed deadline to close the prison is more than six years past due.

Initially, the purpose of Guantánamo was to extract useful intelligence from high-level detainees to aid the war on terror. The orders to subject detainees to torture — or what the George W. Bush administration euphemistically called “enhanced interrogation” — came from the White House. It fell to the CIA to carry them out. The agency’s initial intelligence-driven mission got muddled up by other motives — revenge against al Qaeda, the avoidance of political fallout, control over the flow of information to Congress and the public, and later, by the problem of what to do with the detainees themselves.

Today’s legal environment is more open to detainees giving accounts of their own torture, according to Joseph Margulies, an attorney who represents Abu Zubaydah, one of the three men who the CIA admits having waterboarded.

“It is our position that the United States government has confirmed that Abu Zubaydah’s first-person account of his treatment is not classified,” Margulies said. “Therefore he ought to be allowed to disclose it.” As evidence of the shift, he pointed to the release of the Senate torture report summary, accounts of torture taken down by lawyers representing Majid Khan, and filings in Salim v. Mitchell, a lawsuit brought against two psychologists who designed the torture program as contractors for the CIA.

Connell, the attorney representing Ammar al-Baluchi, said that he welcomed the shift toward openness at Guantánamo but that the rules were still too restrictive. “The most important information for accountability is who did what and where they did it. Until that information is declassified, there will never be accountability for the CIA’s torture program.”

Top photo: The United States military courtroom at Camp Justice, where the U.S. military held its war court for the five Guantánamo Bay prisoners accused of helping orchestrate the September 11 terror attack. June 27, 2013, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

 https://theintercept.com/2016/08/15/documents-confirm-cia-censorship-of-guantanamo-trials/

28 Pages – Summer of Chaos – Dividing Nations – Civil Wars – NWO

The 28 pages of the 911 commission report .. The timing of it’s Release.

Anyone that has payed attention to these topics, already knew that the report would lay the blame on the Saudi Government. All the report does is say that someone may have know someone that might have been in contact with the Saudi Government and what has actually been released even says that there has been no vetted conclusions .. All of this is to protect Israel. As to the timing of it’s release has as much to do with a distraction as blaming one of Israel’s Governments and Lands to take over. Timing it with the Turmoil happening here in the US and European Countries.
Remember this Friends .. The United States is the Biggest Prize for the NWO. Rothschild and Rockefeller banking Families have been Working as Parasites off of all of the countries of the Globe for far way to long.

Dallas Shooting – Agent Provocateur – 100% False Flag Event – War on Terror Israel

The American people have been the primary target of the vicious ‘psychological warfare’ waged by the Israeli government. The purpose of the Israeli psychological warfare is to create fear through false-flag terrorism like 9-11 in order to impose the Zionist fraud known as the “War on Terror”

War_on_terror3

The ‘‘war on terror’’ has nothing to do with protecting the U.S. and world’s people from ‘‘terrorists,’’ and everything to do with securing the American empire abroad and muzzling democracy and human rights at home. The 9-11 attacks were the pretext, which ‘‘sold’’ the tale of evil Muslim terrorists imminently threatening Americans. That tale allowed the Cheney-led members of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) to initiate a plan for world domination, which they had planned since 1990. The ‘‘war on terror’’ is modeled on Islamophobic myths, policies, and political structures developed by the Israeli Likud in 1979 to inspire popular support for U.S. world conquest initiatives. To defeat this plan, we must overcome our Islamophobic fear of ‘‘terrorists’’ and stand in solidarity with Muslims.

From 1976 to 1978, Benjamin Netanyahu worked for the Boston Consulting Group, a firm connected to the Rothschild family.  In 1979, with his father, Benzion, Netanyahu co-founded an institute on terrorism.  They then organized an international conference in Jerusalem that emphasized the need for Western nations to fight terror groups (the groups opposed to Israeli occupation) – and the regimes supporting them.  The terrorism data that Netanyahu used to make his case at the conference was exaggerated and fraudulent.  George H.W. Bush spoke at the conference. –

“In the summer of 1979, a group of powerful and influential people joined to launch an international propaganda offensive to promote and exploit the issue of ‘international terrorism’,” Philip Paull of San Francisco State University wrote in his 1982 thesis on the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism. “The propaganda ‘blitz’ originated in Jerusalem. The conspiratorial network included present and former members of the Israeli and United States governments…
“This ‘anti-terrorist’ propaganda campaign was and is being conducted in a style reminiscent of wartime ‘psychological warfare’ by journalists serving as conduits and spreaders of misinformation originating in Jerusalem,” Paull wrote in his thesis…
As Paull demonstrates in his thesis, “the entire notion of ‘international terrorism’ as promoted by the Jerusalem Conference rests on a faulty, dishonest, and ultimately corrupt information base.” This is equally true of the official versions of the terror attacks of 1993 and 2001. They are nothing more than packs of lies designed to place the blame on Arabs and Muslims.
Begin_on_terrorism_bollyn

THE FATHER OF TERRORISM – Menachem Begin, the terrorist founder of Israel’s ruling Likud party, bragged about being “the father of terrorism in all the world.” The Likud party is now headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.

“How does it feel, in the light of all that’s going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?”
“In the Middle East?” he [Begin] bellowed, in his thick, cartoon accent. “In all the world!”
– Russell Warren Howe interview with Menachem Begin, January 1974

wac-a-terrorist

The “War on Terror” is like the “Wac-a-Terrorist” game in which Western nations pound Middle Eastern nations in response to acts of terrorism. The United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq based on false claims that they were involved in the terrorism of 9-11. (Cartoon by Peter Brookes)

It should be obvious to anyone who thinks about terrorism and the global “War on Terror” that we have utterly failed to understand and address the root causes of terrorism.  This is true whether we are talking about false-flag terrorism, such as 9-11, or real ‘terrorism’, such as what we see when Palestinians take up arms against the Israeli occupation.

In spite of all this effort and money spent, the threat of global terrorism seems to gaining strength every day, as we can see from the recent downing of the Russian plane in the Sinai and the attacks in Paris. Clearly, we must be doing something wrong.

SHOW NOTES
: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://henrymakow.com/2016/03/massive-zionist-fraud.html#sthash.jtHTdC3o.dpuf

– http://henrymakow.com/2016/03/massive-zionist-fraud.html

time line .. http://www.shmoop.com/war-on-terror/timeline.html

http://www.shmoop.com/war-on-terror/people.html
http://henrymakow.com/2016/03/massive-zionist-fraud.html#sthash.TAOzz4ey.dpuf